ArticleSpine surgery and related research2024
Factors Associated with Early Postoperative Pain after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Article in Spine surgery and related research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of Pain Management After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Bibliometric Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pain research & management · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite that lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive surgery, some patients complain of severe site pain immediately after the surgery. This study aimed to explore the extent of perioperative pain after LLIF, compare the degree of perioperative pain after LLIF with that after other surgical procedures, and evaluate the factors associated with severe pain in the early postoperative period. Methods: In this study, 93 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgeries for lumbar degenerative diseases were analyzed. The patients were categorized into three groups based on the surgical procedure: Group L, LLIF with percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS); Group P, posterolateral fusion (PLF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF); and Group D, posterior decompression (fenestration). The extent of low back pain was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) preoperatively and from postoperative days 1 to 14. Results: The VAS score for postoperative pain decreased in a time-dependent manner in all three groups (P<0.01). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the VAS in Group L was significantly higher than that in Group D (P<0.01). Time point analysis revealed that the VAS scores from postoperative days 1 to 9 in Group L were significantly higher than those in Group D (P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in the VAS scores of postoperative pain between Groups L and P on all postoperative days. The VAS score for early postoperative pain in Group L was significantly correlated with the change in disc height index (P<0.05, r=0.43) and tended to be associated with the grade of preoperative disc degeneration and the VAS score of preoperative low back pain (P=0.076-0.19). Conclusions: This study is the first to evaluate the factors associated with pain during the early postoperative period of LLIF. Although LLIF is a minimally invasive surgery, severe pain may develop in patients with significant preoperative disc degeneration or following spinal correction surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.