Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399420›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2024

Adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Being a Mother scale.

Anna Riera-Martín, Antonio Oliver-Roig, Susana Cormenzana, Miguel Richart-Martínez, Ana Martínez-Pampliega

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna Riera-MartínDepartment of Psychology, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Antonio Oliver-RoigDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Susana CormenzanaDepartment of Psychology, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.
Miguel Richart-MartínezDepartment of Nursing, University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Ana Martínez-PampliegaDepartment of Psychology, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Becoming a mother is a very important process because of the impact it can have on women and their families. Currently, there is no validated questionnaire that evaluates the process of becoming a mother in the Spanish population. Moreover, no consistent results have been obtained to identify significant differences between primiparous and multiparous mothers. Aim: (1) Linguistic and metric validation of the Being a Mother scale (BaM-13) in the Spanish population, (2) analysis of possible differences between primiparous and multiparous mothers' experience of motherhood. Methods: Instrumental design. In 2016-2017, a sample of 579 mothers with children between 6 and 11 months of age completed the Spanish version of BaM-13. The instrument was translated using forward and back translation. Construct validity, internal consistency, and criterion validity were empirically analyzed. Results: Factorial analyses showed that the scale presented two adequate factors. Internal consistency of the global scale ( Conclusions: The Spanish version of the BaM-13 scale is valid for measuring mothers' experience of motherhood in a wide range of domains. The findings of the study show the importance of considering parity in the experience of becoming a mother, highlighting the approach to postnatal bonding in primiparous mothers. Additionally, we underline that it should not be assumed that multiparous mothers experience fewer difficulties in their motherhood process.

Indexed as

MothersPsychometricsAdultDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansInfantMother-Child RelationsParityPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslationsYoung AdultBeing a Mother scaleMotherhoodParityPerinatal mental healthPostpartumPsychometric propertiesReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID39399420
PMCPMC11468896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.