ArticleTechnical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology2024
Assessment of usage, reuse and disposal of thermoplastic masks among radiotherapy technologists in India: A nationwide perspective.
Article in Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Study of Feasibility for Reusing Thermoplastic Masks - Toward a Green Environment.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiotherapy (RT) relies on devices like thermoplastic masks (TMs), that are made up of specialized thermoplastic polymers, and used as an immobilization tool. The study aims to assess the practice of usage and reuse of TMs among radiation therapy technologists (RTTs) in India and explore their awareness of environmental impact during disposal. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among RTTs working in different healthcare settings. A structured questionnaire designed by a team of RTTs and radiation oncologists was used to collect responses. Questionnaire encompassed data pertaining to demographics, existing patient load, daily utilisation and reuse practice of TMs, preferred method of disposal and awareness of RTTs regarding environmental consequences associated with TM disposal. Results: A total of 430 RTTs participated in the study, with a median age of 31 years and a median professional experience of 8 years. Among the participants, 213 (49.6 %) reported daily TM utilization in more than 50 patients. TM reuse was reported by 350 (81.1 %) RTTs, with 257 (60 %) reusing TMs in both curative and palliative treatments. Reuse of TMs was observed more commonly in RTTs working in government facilities (81.2 %).Regarding disposal preferences, 381 (88.6%) participants preferred discarding used TMs in biomedical waste and 64.8% of these ultimately ended up as discarded scrap. Awareness regarding adverse environmental impact associated with TM disposal was reported by 320 (74.4%) participant RTTs. Conclusion: The study highlights the prevalent practice of reuse of TMs, especially in curative treatments, government-run facilities and busy treatment settings. Additionally, it emphasises the imperative for enhanced bio-medical waste management practices to facilitate more effective handling and disposal of used TMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.