ArticleBone reports2024
Association between trabecular bone score, 10-year probability risk for fracture, and vertebral fractures in rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Bone reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a new perspective on risk factors and clinical prediction models.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Review
- Impact of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies on bone health in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a narrative review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The aim was to assess the association and predictive value of trabecular bone score (TBS), fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), and TBS-adjusted FRAX with prevalent vertebral fractures (VFs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Patients diagnosed with RA were included in this cross-sectional study. Clinical data and laboratory tests were collected on the same day as the dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. TBS, bone mineral density (BMD), and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) were obtained from the DXA scan. We used the FRAX tool to assess the 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF-FRAX) and hip fracture (HF-FRAX) with and without BMD. These parameters were further adjusted for TBS. Patients with prevalent VFs were defined as those with moderate to severe VFs from T4 to L4. VFs presence was used as the binary variable in the logistic regressions and receiving operator characteristics (ROC) curves analysis. Results: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled, with 55.1 % being postmenopausal. The mean TBS was 1.328 ± 0.104. Osteoporosis according to the WHO criteria was present in 39 patients (56.5 %), and six patients (8.7 %) had VFs with thoracic predominance (66.67 %). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between TBS and vertebral fractures, but FRAX scores indicated such an association. The area under the curve (AUC) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the MOF-FRAX score with BMD, MOF-FRAX score without BMD, TBS-adjusted MOF-FRAX score, and TBS were 0.837 [0.686-0.988], 0.795 [0.629-0.961], 0.778 [0.571-0.984], and 0.515 [0.298-0.731], respectively. Conclusion: In our RA patients, FRAX scores were associated with vertebral fractures (VFs), while TBS was not. The MOF-FRAX score combined with BMD, showed the best AUC for VFs in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.