Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399393›Full record

ArticlePhotoacoustics2024

Machine learning radiomics based on intra and peri tumor PA/US images distinguish between luminal and non-luminal tumors in breast cancers.

Sijie Mo, Hui Luo, Mengyun Wang, Guoqiu Li, Yao Kong, Hongtian Tian, Huaiyu Wu, Shuzhen Tang, Yinhao Pan, Youping Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photoacoustics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Integrating deep learning and radiomics for precise identification of luminal A/B breast cancer subtypes on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sijie MoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Hui LuoDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Mengyun WangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Guoqiu LiDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Yao KongDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Hongtian TianDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Huaiyu WuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Shuzhen TangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Yinhao PanMindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co.,Ltd., ShenZhen 518057,China.
Youping WangDepartment of Clinical and Research, Shenzhen Mindray Bio-medical Electronics Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China.
Jinfeng XuDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Zhibin HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.
Fajin DongDepartment of Ultrasound, The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University, Guangdong 518020, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate a radiomics model using Photoacoustic/ultrasound (PA/US) imaging at intra and peri-tumoral area to differentiate Luminal and non-Luminal breast cancer (BC) and to determine the optimal peritumoral area for accurate classification. Materials and methods: From February 2022 to April 2024, this study continuously collected 322 patients at Shenzhen People's Hospital, using standardized conditions for PA/US imaging of BC. Regions of interest were delineated using ITK-SNAP, with peritumoral regions of 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm automatically expanded using code from the Pyradiomic package. Feature extraction was subsequently performed using Pyradiomics. The study employed Z-score normalization, Spearman correlation for feature correlation, and LASSO regression for feature selection, validated through 10-fold cross-validation. The radiomics model integrated intra and peri-tumoral area, evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curve(ROC), Calibration and Decision Curve Analysis(DCA). Results: We extracted and selected features from intratumoral and peritumoral PA/US images regions at 2 mm, 4 mm, and 6 mm. The comprehensive radiomics model, integrating these regions, demonstrated enhanced diagnostic performance, especially the 4 mm model which showed the highest area under the curve(AUC):0.898(0.78-1.00) and comparably high accuracy (0.900) and sensitivity (0.937). This model outperformed the standalone clinical model and combined clinical-radiomics model in distinguishing between Luminal and non-Luminal BC, as evidenced in the test set results. Conclusion: This study developed a radiomics model integrating intratumoral and peritumoral at 4 mm region PA/US model, enhancing the differentiation of Luminal from non-Luminal BC. It demonstrated the diagnostic utility of peritumoral characteristics, reducing the need for invasive biopsies and aiding chemotherapy planning, while emphasizing the importance of optimizing tumor surrounding size for improved model accuracy.

Indexed as

Breast cancerMolecular typingPhotoacoustic imagingRadiomicsUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID39399393
PMCPMC11467668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.