Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399373›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2024

Investigation of protein family relationships with deep learning.

Irina Ponamareva, Antonina Andreeva, Maxwell L Bileschi, Lucy Colwell, Alex Bateman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Irina PonamarevaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6041-5869
Antonina AndreevaEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0450-0091
Maxwell L BileschiGoogle Research, Cambridge, MA 02142, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6771-0590
Lucy ColwellDepartment of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1EW, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-0337
Alex BatemanEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire CB10 1SD, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6982-4660

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: In this article, we propose a method for finding similarities between Pfam families based on the pre-trained neural network ProtENN2. We use the model ProtENN2 per-residue embeddings to produce new high-dimensional per-family embeddings and develop an approach for calculating inter-family similarity scores based on these embeddings, and evaluate its predictions using structure comparison. Results: We apply our method to Pfam annotation by refining clan membership for Pfam families, suggesting both new members of existing clans and potential new clans for future Pfam releases. We investigate some of the failure modes of our approach, which suggests directions for future improvements. Our method is relatively simple with few parameters and could be applied to other protein family classification models. Overall, our work suggests potential benefits of employing deep learning for improving our understanding of protein family relationships and functions of previously uncharacterized families. Availability and implementation: github.com/iponamareva/ProtCNNSim, 10.5281/zenodo.10091909.

Identifiers

PMID39399373
PMCPMC11467057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.