ReviewWorld neurosurgery: X2024
Traumatic spine fractures and concomitant venous thromboembolism: A systematic review.
Review in World neurosurgery: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Acute management of spinal fractures: What you need to know.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) associated with bony fractures have been documented in the literature. However, the literature is not very exhaustive when it comes to VTE associated with traumatic spine fractures. Thus the purpose of this systematic review analyzing the incidence of VTE associated with spinal trauma. Methods: An electronic search strategy was elaborated in Pubmed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar (page 1-20) since inception till November 2023. Results: Twelve studies were included with three prospective clinical studies, seven retrospective studies, one observational cohort study, and one propensity-matched analysis. These involved 256,107 subjects with 6039 concomitant VTE (2.4 %). Potential risk factors included age, D-dimer levels, length of hospital stay, associated spinal cord injury, location of the vertebral trauma and other baseline patient-dependent characteristics. Conclusion: This review found that the rate VTE in spinal trauma patients was 2.4 % (6039/256107). To optimize care, clinical decision making should be tailored to each patient using a combined approach of imaging, laboratory findings, and serial physical examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.