ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2025
What is the multifactorial efficacy of day-zero ambulation post-total hip replacement surgery: A systematic review.
Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine the multi-factorial efficacy of day-zero ambulation following primary total hip arthroplasty. Data sources: MEDLINE, CINAHL, AMED, EMBASE and APA PsychInfo in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Review methods: Studies were classified for study design and ranked in a hierarchy of evidence. Studies ranked excellent or good who followed a treatment pathway inclusive of day-zero ambulation were appraised using the appropriate content checklist (PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE), CASP checklist and where possible for risk of bias using the appropriate tool (RoB 2.0, ROBINS-1). Results were produced using a narrative synthesis. Results: A total of 8 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies reported a consensus of a reduced length of hospital stay in pathways where day-zero ambulation was included, but with varying effect sizes. Findings suggested that day-zero ambulation may speed up return to function following THR. There was not enough evidence to provide synthesised results on financial efficiency, post-operative pain, or safety of day-zero ambulation via post-operative complications. Conclusions: This systematic review reveals limitations within the literature base on day zero-ambulation. There are problems of concomitant interventions, methodological heterogeneity, and an abundance of research low in the evidence hierarchy. Day zero-ambulation shows promise in reducing length of hospital stay and there is suggestion that it accelerates functional recovery. However, to establish this with rigor, there is further need for high quality, prospective studies such as RCTs to examine the multi-factorial effect of day-zero ambulation, challenge existing theories and contribute to confident synthesised findings more useful to clinical decision makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.