ArticlePain reports2024
The relationship between changes in inflammation and locomotor function in sensory phenotypes of central neuropathic pain after spinal cord injury.
Article in Pain reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Central neuropathic pain (CNP) commonly develops in patients after spinal cord injury (SCI), causing debilitating symptoms and sensory abnormalities to mechanical and thermal stimuli. The biological variability of pain phenotypes in individuals has limited the number of positive outcomes. Thus, it is necessary to investigate the physiological processes contributing to sensory changes that develop over time. Objective: To investigate the physiological processes contributing to neuropathic pain sensory changes and locomotor impairments with sensory phenotypes that develop over time. Methods: Using the tail flick and von Frey tests, we performed hierarchical clustering to determine the subpopulation of rats that developed thermal and mechanical sensory abnormalities. To measure inflammation as a potential mediator of CNP phenotypes, we used flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Finally, to assess the secondary effects on locomotor recovery, up to 8 weeks after injury, we used the CatWalk test to assess multiple parameters of gait. Results: The von Frey test showed a subpopulation of SCI rats that were hyposensitive to mechanical stimuli from 6 to 8 weeks after injury. The tail flick test showed a subpopulation of SCI rats that were hypersensitive to thermal stimuli at 1 week and 3 to 8 weeks after injury. Although there were no differences in inflammatory cells between subpopulations, we did see significant changes in locomotor recovery between rats with and without sensory abnormalities. Conclusion: The myeloid cell population at large is not affected by mechanical or thermal phenotypes of pain in this model; however, locomotor recovery is impaired depending on the pain phenotype present. Further investigation into acute inflammatory cells may be insightful for predicting the development of pain phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.