ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024
Development and validation of the Arabic children's strong communication scale: a pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Embedding public and patient involvement in childhood stuttering research: lessons learned from engaging children and families in Saudi Arabia.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The assessment of communication skills in Arabic-speaking children has been challenged by a lack of culturally and linguistically appropriate tools. The Arabic children's strong communication scale (ACSCS) was developed in response to this need, adapting the children's communication checklist-2 (CCC-2) to better suit the Arabic context. Aims: This study aimed to validate the ACSCS and establish its utility in measuring communication strengths among Arabic-speaking children. Methods: A total of 102 participants completed the questionnaire, which included relatives, teachers, and speech therapists of children aged 4-16. Twenty-two items were developed that targeted children communication strengths. The items were based on a theoretical framework that encompassed language proficiency, social communication, and behavioral aspects. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory composite analysis (CCA) were employed to validate the structure of the ACSCS. The scale's reliability was tested using Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability, while its validity was assessed through convergent and discriminant validity measures. Results: The EFA and CCA confirmed a clear distinction of communication strengths. Reliability analyses indicated high internal consistency for the ACSCS. Discriminant validity was established, showing that the ACSCS accurately measures distinct facets of communication skills. Conclusion: The ACSCS is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing communication skills in Arabic-speaking children, reflecting strengths across various domains. Implications: The scale has significant implications for educational and clinical settings, providing a culturally sensitive tool for practitioners and researchers to assess and support the communication development of Arabic-speaking children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.