ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
Causal effects of specific gut microbiota on spinal stenosis diseases: a two-sample mendelian randomization study.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the Role of Skin Microbiota in Autoimmune Skin Diseases from a Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Perspective.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Article
- Inflammatory protein mediators linking gut microbiota to degenerative lumbar spine disorders: cross-disease genetic evidence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Gut mucosal microbiota and local intervertebral disc immunity: candidate circulating-cytokine-independent pathways informed by Mendelian randomization evidence.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although recent observational studies and clinical trials have indicated a strong association between the gut microbiota and spinal stenosis diseases, the causal relationship between them remains unclear. Methods: Based on large-scale genome-wide association studies, we employed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to analyse the causal relationships between the gut microbiota (GM) and 3 spinal stenosis diseases: adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), lumbar spondylolisthesis (LS), and spinal stenosis (SS). MR analysis was performed using the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method as the primary approach, supplemented by MR‒Egger regression, weighted median, and weighted mode analyses. MR-PRESSO and MR‒Egger regression were employed to assess horizontal pleiotropy. Cochran's Q test was used to evaluate heterogeneity. Further leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was conducted to ascertain the reliability of the causal relationships. Results: The IVW method identified 9 gut microbiota taxa (9 genera) that were causally related to AIS, 14 taxa (4 phyla, 2 classes, 2 orders, 1 family, and 5 genera) to LS, and 4 taxa (2 classes, 1 order, and 1 genus) to SS. The Cochrane Q test results did not indicate heterogeneity. Moreover, both the MR‒Egger intercept test and the MR-PRESSO global test demonstrated that our findings were robust against potential horizontal pleiotropy. Furthermore, leave-one-out analysis provided additional evidence supporting the reliability of our identified causal relationships. Conclusion: Our findings have substantiated the potential causal impact of specific GM taxa on AIS, LS, and SS, thereby offering novel insights into the mechanisms mediated by the gut microbiota in these three diseases and laying the foundation for targeted preventive measures in further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.