ArticleFrontiers in genetics2024
ML-GAP: machine learning-enhanced genomic analysis pipeline using autoencoders and data augmentation.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thyroid disease classification using generative adversarial networks and Kolmogorov-Arnold network for three-class classification.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Investigation of Binary and Multiclass Classification Performance of Skin Cancer Images Using Transfer Learning Methods.Journal of clinical practice and research · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approach and Bioinformatics Analysis Discovered Key Genomic Signatures for Hepatitis B Virus-Associated Hepatocyte Remodeling and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: The advent of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) has significantly advanced our understanding of the transcriptomic landscape, revealing intricate gene expression patterns across biological states and conditions. However, the complexity and volume of RNA-Seq data pose challenges in identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs), critical for understanding the molecular basis of diseases like cancer. Methods: We introduce a novel Machine Learning-Enhanced Genomic Data Analysis Pipeline (ML-GAP) that incorporates autoencoders and innovative data augmentation strategies, notably the MixUp method, to overcome these challenges. By creating synthetic training examples through a linear combination of input pairs and their labels, MixUp significantly enhances the model's ability to generalize from the training data to unseen examples. Results: Our results demonstrate the ML-GAP's superiority in accuracy, efficiency, and insights, particularly crediting the MixUp method for its substantial contribution to the pipeline's effectiveness, advancing greatly genomic data analysis and setting a new standard in the field. Discussion: This, in turn, suggests that ML-GAP has the potential to perform more accurate detection of DEGs but also offers new avenues for therapeutic intervention and research. By integrating explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) techniques, ML-GAP ensures a transparent and interpretable analysis, highlighting the significance of identified genetic markers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.