Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399143›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Comparative evaluation of pediatric endodontic rotary file systems to bending and torsion tests: A finite element analysis.

Harshinie Manivannan, Selvakumar Haridoss, Vignesh K C, Kavitha Swaminathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Harshinie ManivannanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Selvakumar HaridossDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vignesh K CDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kavitha SwaminathanDepartment of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Sri Ramachandra Dental College and Hospital, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to Be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective: The introduction of Paediatric NiTi instruments has transformed the field of paediatric endodontics. However, no studies are available on the mechanical behaviour of these files, wherein Finite Element Analysis (FEA) was found to play a major role. The objective of this study is to evaluate the mechanical behavior of three commercially available pediatric endodontic rotary file systems to bending and torsion stress analysis test through Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Methods: A Finite Element Analysis study was performed on three commercially available pediatric endodontic rotary files (Pro AF baby, Kedo SG and Neoendo pedoflex) available for cleaning and shaping the narrow root canals of the deciduous teeth to bending and torsion tests with the boundary conditions according to ISO 3630-1 specifications. Results: In the bending analysis, Pro AF baby files were found to withstand the complete bending tests without yielding with a maximum von Mises stress of 1366 MPa, and Kedo SG, Neoendo Pedoflex file exhibited maximum von Mises stress of 2296 MPa, 1971 MPa. Under torsion tests Kedo SG exhibited maximum stress distribution, while Neoendo Pedoflex and Pro AF baby files exhibited similar stress distribution. Conclusion: Pro AF baby file effectively withstood the rigorous 45 -degree bending examination without experiencing yielding, while Kedo SG file exhibited higher flexibility. Under torsional resistance test, all the three instruments exhibited similar stress distribution under the yield limit. In summary, the mechanical behaviour (bending and torsion) of pediatric rotary file systems were influenced by design of the files.

Indexed as

Finite element analysisMaterial testingPediatric rotary filesStress

Identifiers

PMID39399143
PMCPMC11470475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.