ArticleIJID regions2024
Detection of COVID-19 incidence among attendees of the 2022 Hajj season.
Article in IJID regions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study investigated the presence of COVID-19 cases among pilgrims, health care workers (HCWs), and non-HCWs of Hajj 2022. Methods: Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from 491 attendees of Hajj 2022. All participants received three doses of COVID-19 vaccines. Paired (n = 138; 69 participants) and unpaired (n = 422; 422 participants) nasopharyngeal swabs were subjected to reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction targeting E gene of β-coronaviruses and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase of SARS-CoV-2. The results were linked to the participants' profiles, including role during Hajj, presence of respiratory symptoms or comorbidities, contact with symptomatic individuals, smoking status, and COVID-19 recovery. Results: A total of 20 (20 of 560; 3.6%) samples tested positive for COVID-19. Most cases (18 of 20; 90%) were pilgrims and non-HCWs. Six (30%) samples belonged to participants with previous positive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. A total of 12 (60%) samples belonged to participants with respiratory symptoms. Three (15%) cases were linked to participants who had contact with individuals with respiratory symptoms. All cases belonged to individuals with no comorbidities, apart from a single case who has a chronic sinusitis. Five (25%) cases were smokers. No significant association was found between positive COVID-19 test and participants' profiles. Conclusions: Few COVID-19 cases were detected in this study. Sustainable surveillance of COVID-19 and other respiratory viruses during Hajj seasons remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.