Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399121›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering education2024

Rethinking the Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Course.

Pamela K Kreeger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pamela K KreegerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8193-1007

Funding

UW COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER SUPPORTP30CA014520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Christian Capitini · 1985 to 2026
$142.6M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR; also referred to as Responsible and Ethical Conduct of Research) courses are required for students funded by NIH training grants or NSF awards. Most university RCR courses closely follow the list of topics described by the NSF/NIH and use the low-effort, distributed teaching model described by the NIH. Recommended topics include research misconduct, data management, authorship, peer review, conflicts of interest, intellectual property, mentor/mentee relationships, collaboration, safety and regulatory processes, and ethics. While these topics prepare the student to become a responsible researcher, we also considered our responsibility as a department to provide students with tools to succeed. Specifically, we wanted this course to 1) build community, 2) provide students with skills to face challenges associated with graduate school, and 3) prepare the student to start their research project. To accomplish these goals, we incorporated additional topics and used an instructional model with a central instructor supported by faculty discussants during a subset of classes. The result is a course that is compatible with funding agency requirements but also helps to build a stronger community and formalize aspects of training that do not easily fit within technical courses.

Indexed as

cohort buildingengineering educationonboardingscientific writing instructionwellness

Identifiers

PMID39399121
PMCPMC11467715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.