ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2024
Real-world clinical accuracy of long cortical bone trajectory screw placement using a patient-specific template guide.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical and radiological evaluation of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific 3D templates: a multicentric prospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Are Patient-Specific 3-Dimensionally Printed Instrumentations a Viable Solution to Safe Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement? A Systematic Review.International journal of spine surgery · 2026Article
- How Patient-Specific Guides Can Ease the Learning Curve of Cortical Bone Trajectory: A Retrospective Study.Cureus · 2026Article
- CT vs. MRI-based synthetic CT: accuracy of thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw placement using 3D-printed guides.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws can be very reliable anchors if inserted precisely anterior to the vertebral body; however, their trajectory is narrow, and malpositioning of the screw is not rare, especially for surgeons who are not familiar with the CBT screw. Patient-specific template guides are a solution to this problem; however, their accuracy and usefulness in clinical settings remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of long CBT placement using a patient-specific screw-guide system. Methods: This research involved a retrospective clinical evaluation of patients who had been enrolled prospectively. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent posterior lumbar spinal fusion using the guide system performed by three experienced spine surgeons were included. Initially, the placement of the CBT screws was mapped out in three dimensions utilizing simulation software. Prior to the surgery, a specific screw guide was designed for each vertebra. Using these guides, a total of 412 screws were placed. To assess any perforation of the pedicle and to compare the discrepancies between the intended and the actual positions of the screws, postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were utilized. Results: Overall, 382 screws (92.7%) were fully inside the pedicle (L2-5) and there was no incidence of neurovascular injuries. The mean depth of the screw in the vertebral body (% depth) was 60.9%±8.1% and the mean % depth deviation between planned screws and actual screw was 9.6%±7.1% in total. In all vertebrae, the mean % depth was approximately 10% smaller for the actual screws than the planned screws. The mean sagittal and transverse angular deviations between the planned screws and actual screws were 2.30±1.87° and 1.89±1.26°, respectively. Overall, deviation in the sagittal angle tended to be cranial. Conclusions: We demonstrated that a patient-specific screw guide is useful for supporting precise long CBT screw insertion into the lumbar spine in a clinical setting. This patient-specific template guide could be a potential solution to accurately insert long CBT screws and reduce complications, even for surgeons who are not experienced in the CBT technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.