Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399090›Full record

ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2024

Lateral decubitus anterior exposure of the L4-5 disc maintains safety compared with supine positioning.

Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nam V HuynhSpine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Windsor, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6629-3467
J Alex ThomasAtlantic Neurosurgical and Spine, Wilmington, NC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6706-6539
Leon EisenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Domenic RobinsonDepartment of Vascular Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia.
Mark MedleyAtlantic Neurosurgical and Spine, Wilmington, NC, USA.
Aaron J BucklandSpine and Scoliosis Research Associates Australia, Windsor, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0275-5020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP. Methods: A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP. Results: One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 Conclusions: Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.

Indexed as

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)L4–L5lateral decubituslumbartotal disc replacement (TDR)

Identifiers

PMID39399090
PMCPMC11467285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.