ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2024
Surgical technique of 3D computer-assisted navigated posterior fixation of the upper cervical spine: illustration of three cases.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Navigation in Cervical Spine Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Instrumentation of the upper cervical spine, such as cervical pedicle, lateral mass, pars, or translaminar screws, is considered high risk due to the specific challenges of this anatomic region, including the proximity of vertebral and carotid arteries and nerve roots, as well as its delicate bony architecture. In recent years, advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques, such as intraoperative computed tomography (iCT; AIRO CT), have emerged, enabling computer-assisted navigation (CAN). This integration of real-time imaging into navigation enhances screw accuracy and diminishes perioperative risks, extending to the postsurgical confirmation of screw placement. Although CAN utilization has become more prominent in lumbar and thoracic surgeries, its integration into cervical spine procedures has been constrained thus far. This can be ascribed to the variable screw trajectories necessary for cervical spine procedures, coupled with potential anatomical variations such as a high-riding vertebral artery, increasing the degree of challenge during surgery. To date, no study has comprehensively described in detail the technique of upper cervical instrumentation employing automatic image registration, navigation, and iCT validation of the positioned screws. In this manuscript, a detailed description of CAN in high cervical instrumentation is given, including C1 lateral mass screws with the notching technique, C2 and C3 pars screws, and translaminar screws guided by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and iCT for assessment of screw position. For this purpose, three different patients suffering from distinct cervical pathologies, such as nonunion of a C2 fracture and atlantoaxial arthropathy with or without ankylosis, are presented, with a specific surgical approach tailored to the anatomical variations of each patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.