ArticleJournal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)2024
Total joint replacement of the lumbar spine: report of the first two cases with 16 years of follow-up.
Article in Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interventional, multicentre investigation of a novel lumbar total joint replacement: propensity matched study design and protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Total joint replacement of the lumbar spine: surgical technique and procedural details.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Total Joint Replacement of the Lumbar Spine: 12-Month Pain and Functional Outcomes From an Investigational Device Exemption Clinical Trial.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- Sensitivity of Lumbar Total Joint Replacement to Axial and Coronal Plane Misalignment Using Computational Modeling.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
- The Future of Motion Preservation and Arthroplasty in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Total Joint Replacement of the Lumbar Spine: The Future of Motion Preservation.International journal of spine surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Total joint replacement (TJR) of the lumbar spine is a revolutionary procedure that couples the clinical benefits of neural decompression with preservation of natural motion and sagittal balance at the operative level. The TJR procedure involves reconstruction of the entire motion segment using a posterior bilateral transforaminal approach to access the disc space. The TJR implant (MOTUS, 3Spine, Chattanooga, TN, USA) replaces the function of the intervertebral disc and facet joints, performing biomechanically as a new articulation for the resected, degenerated disc and facets. The implant has been optimized to simulate the kinematic characteristics of the three-joint complex. Case Description: Two male patients, ages 32 and 38 years, underwent the first TJR procedures in 2007 in South Africa. Both patients had imaging evidence of advanced spinal degeneration with unremitting back and leg pain refractory to conservative management. Symptom amelioration was achieved postoperatively with markedly reduced pains scores and improved function at clinical follow-up. Both cases were recently re-examined after 16 years and the patients reported that the procedure significantly changed their lives. Neither believes they have a lingering back condition and they have been able to fully participate in all functions related to work, family and recreation. There was little to no imaging evidence of adjacent segment disease or arthritic changes at this long-term follow-up interval. Conclusions: After 16 years of clinical follow-up, the implant continues to function normally, without evidence of adjacent segment degeneration and both patients continue to enjoy activities of daily living without back or leg pain or other functional impairments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.