Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399063›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2024

Nova Scotia's Deemed Consent for Deceased Organ Donation: Family Member Perspectives and Experiences in the ICU Setting.

Aimee J Sarti, Stephanie Sutherland, Matthew J Weiss, Alain Landry, Heather Hemming, Jade Dirk, Ken Lotherington, Stephen Beed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Five years after introduction of an opt-out consent system for organ donation; lessons learned from England and the Netherlands.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aimee J SartiDepartment of Critical Care, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stephanie SutherlandOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Matthew J WeissPopulation Health and Optimal Health Practices Research Unit, Trauma-Emergency-Critical Care Medicine, CHU de Quebec-Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Alain LandryLegacy of Life Organ Donation Program, Nova Scotia Health, NS, Canada.
Heather HemmingLegacy of Life Organ Donation Program, Nova Scotia Health, NS, Canada.
Jade DirkLegacy of Life Organ Donation Program, Nova Scotia Health, NS, Canada.
Ken LotheringtonCanadian Blood Services, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Stephen BeedDepartment of Critical Care, Dalhousie University Faculty of Medicine, Halifax, NS, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the experience of family members of potential organ donors in the intensive care unit following the change to deemed consent legislation in Nova Scotia. Methods: This was a qualitative study with semistructured, in-depth interviews with 17 family members who were asked to make an organ donation decision on behalf of patients admitted to the intensive care unit in Nova Scotia. We analyzed themes using a descriptive approach. Participants were recruited from the organ donation organization in Nova Scotia, Canada. Results: Participant awareness and knowledge of the Human Organ and Tissue Donation Act legislation varied from individuals having no awareness and knowledge of the bill to those who had awareness and optimism that the legislation would be beneficial for increasing organ donation rates in the province. Other themes emerging from the interviews included (1) COVID context, (2) quality of healthcare professional care, (3) family support, and (4) barriers to donation (waiting, consent questionnaire, and patient transfers). Conclusions: The Human Organ and Tissue Donation Act legislation included enhanced support, which was viewed positively by family members. There is a need for continued evaluation as most participants felt it was too early to see the tangible impacts of the newly implemented legislation.

Identifiers

PMID39399063
PMCPMC11469852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.