Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39399054›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

A novel cortical biomarker signature predicts individual pain sensitivity.

Nahian S Chowdhury, Chuan Bi, Andrew J Furman, Alan Ki Chiang, Patrick Skippen, Emily Si, Samantha K Millard, Sarah M Margerison, Darrah Spies, Michael L Keaser and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07756229 (Predictors of Response After Physiotherapy Treatment in People With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07756229 narecruitingnot on this map

Predictors of Response After Physiotherapy Treatment in People With Chronic Non-specific Neck Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorAnder Cervantes BenítezRan2024 to 2027Enrolled100ConditionsNeck Pain Musculoskeletal, Chronic Neck PainArmsManual physiotherapy and neck-specific exercise programme
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nahian S ChowdhuryCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6357-0746
Chuan BiDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Andrew J FurmanDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA.
Alan Ki ChiangCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Patrick SkippenCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Emily SiCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Samantha K MillardCenter for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Sarah M MargerisonDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA.
Darrah SpiesDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA.
Michael L KeaserDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA.
Joyce T Da SilvaDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA.
Shuo ChenDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine.
Siobhan M SchabrunThe Gray Centre for Mobility and Activity, Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Healthcare London, Canada.
David A SeminowiczDepartment of Neural and Pain Sciences, University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3111-3756

Funding

Validation of a novel cortical biomarker signature for painR61NS113269 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI DA SILVA, JOYCE TEIXEIRA, SCHABRUN, SIOBHAN · 2019 to 2019
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS113269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Biomarkers would greatly assist decision making in the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of chronic pain. Objective: The present study aimed to undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of two measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME). Design: In this cohort study (recruitment period: November 2020-October 2022), participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography (EEG) to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on Days 0, 2 and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from Days 1-30. Setting: Data collection occurred at a single centre: Neuroscience Research Australia. Participants: We enrolled 159 healthy participants (through notices placed online and at universities across Australia), aged 18-44 with no history of chronic pain, neurological or psychiatric condition. 150 participants completed the protocol. Exposure: Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on Days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: We determined the predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels. Results: The final sample consisted of 66 females and 84 males with a mean age of 25.1 ± 6.2. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC=1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC=0.88[0.78-0.99]). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good-excellent test-retest reliability. Conclusions and Relevance: This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability, suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.

Indexed as

BiomarkerElectroencephalographyPainTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID39399054
PMCPMC11469350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.