ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024
A Tear-Based Approach for Rapid Identification of Bacterial Pathogens in Corneal Ulcers Using Nanopore Sequencing.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Corneal ulcers pose a significant threat to vision, with the need for prompt and precise pathogen identification being critical to effective treatment. This study assesses the efficacy of using next-generation portable sequencing (Nanopore Technology) to detect and identify bacterial pathogens directly from tear samples, providing a non-invasive alternative to traditional corneal scraping and culture, which are limited by high false-negative rates. Design: Prospective observational study. Participants: Ten participants diagnosed with corneal ulcers. Methods: Tear samples were collected from the ocular surface using Schirmer strips. Corneal scrapings and cultures were performed as medically indicated. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified directly from the tear samples using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and Nanopore sequencing was used for bacterial species identification and taxonomic classification. Comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the concordance between Nanopore sequencing results and traditional culture methods. Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of bacterial species detected via Nanopore sequencing with those identified through traditional culture methods. Results: Bacterial DNA was identified in 8 of the 10 samples analyzed using the tear-based sequencing method. Notably, Nanopore sequencing accurately identified the causative bacteria in all 4 samples that exhibited bacterial growth on culture. Additionally, it detected bacterial pathogens in 2 of the 4 ulcers that did not show bacterial growth on culture. In 2 cases where cultures could not be obtained due to the small size of the ulcer, tear sequencing successfully identified bacterial species, highlighting potentially overlooked pathogens in corneal ulcers. Conclusions: PCR amplification of 16S RNA directly from tears followed by Nanopore sequencing is an effective, non-invasive method to identify bacterial pathogens in corneal ulcers, offering non-inferior results to traditional culture methods. This technique not only allows for the detection of traditionally hard-to-culture organisms, providing immediate diagnostic value to guide treatment, but also enhances our understanding of the microbiological landscape of corneal ulcers, thereby informing more effective treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.