ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2024
Deep feature batch correction using ComBat for machine learning applications in computational pathology.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards robust foundation models for digital pathology.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Multiplexed high-content imaging uncovers morphological diversity of lymphocyte activation and dysfunction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Developing artificial intelligence (AI) models for digital pathology requires large datasets from multiple sources. However, without careful implementation, AI models risk learning confounding site-specific features in datasets instead of clinically relevant information, leading to overestimated performance, poor generalizability to real-world data, and potential misdiagnosis. Methods: Whole-slide images (WSIs) from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) colon (COAD), and stomach adenocarcinoma datasets were selected for inclusion in this study. Patch embeddings were obtained using three feature extraction models, followed by ComBat harmonization. Attention-based multiple instance learning models were trained to predict tissue-source site (TSS), as well as clinical and genetic attributes, using raw, Macenko normalized, and Combat-harmonized patch embeddings. Results: TSS prediction achieved high accuracy (AUROC > 0.95) with all three feature extraction models. ComBat harmonization significantly reduced the AUROC for TSS prediction, with mean AUROCs dropping to approximately 0.5 for most models, indicating successful mitigation of batch effects (e.g., CCL-ResNet50 in TCGA-COAD: Pre-ComBat AUROC = 0.960, Post-ComBat AUROC = 0.506, Conclusion: ComBat harmonization of deep learning-derived histology features effectively reduces the risk of AI models learning confounding features in WSIs, ensuring more reliable performance estimates. This approach is promising for the integration of large-scale digital pathology datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.