ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2024
Characterization of arteriosclerosis based on computer-aided measurements of intra-arterial thickness.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Characterization of Lymphocyte Topology on Whole Slide Images of Glomerular Diseases.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026Article
- Clinical Relevance of Computationally Derived Attributes of Arteries and Arterioles in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and minimal change disease.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Glomerular Segmentation, Classification, and Pathomic Feature-based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes in Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Our purpose is to develop a computer vision approach to quantify intra-arterial thickness on digital pathology images of kidney biopsies as a computational biomarker of arteriosclerosis. Approach: The severity of the arteriosclerosis was scored (0 to 3) in 753 arteries from 33 trichrome-stained whole slide images (WSIs) of kidney biopsies, and the outer contours of the media, intima, and lumen were manually delineated by a renal pathologist. We then developed a multi-class deep learning (DL) framework for segmenting the different intra-arterial compartments (training dataset: 648 arteries from 24 WSIs; testing dataset: 105 arteries from 9 WSIs). Subsequently, we employed radial sampling and made measurements of media and intima thickness as a function of spatially encoded polar coordinates throughout the artery. Pathomic features were extracted from the measurements to collectively describe the arterial wall characteristics. The technique was first validated through numerical analysis of simulated arteries, with systematic deformations applied to study their effect on arterial thickness measurements. We then compared these computationally derived measurements with the pathologists' grading of arteriosclerosis. Results: Numerical validation shows that our measurement technique adeptly captured the decreasing smoothness in the intima and media thickness as the deformation increases in the simulated arteries. Intra-arterial DL segmentations of media, intima, and lumen achieved Dice scores of 0.84, 0.78, and 0.86, respectively. Several significant associations were identified between arteriosclerosis grade and pathomic features using our technique (e.g., intima-media ratio average [ Conclusions: We developed a computer vision approach to computationally characterize intra-arterial morphology on digital pathology images and demonstrate its feasibility as a potential computational biomarker of arteriosclerosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.