ArticleCureus2024
The Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Monkey Pox (Mpox) Among Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students in Gujarat, India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Knowledge and perceptions of monkeypox among university students in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: implications for public health preparedness.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Mpox Awareness and Vaccine Acceptability Among Transgender Women and Men Who Have Sex With Men in India: Predictors and Implications for Outbreak Preparedness.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2026Article
- Assessment of Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Towards the Prevention of Monkeypox Among People of Bangladesh With at Least Primary Education: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Monkeypox awareness and public health challenges in conflict affected syria 2024.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe global spread of monkeypox (mpox) has raised concerns about public health preparedness, particularly among young adults. This study aimed to assess and compare the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding mpox among undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students in Gujarat, India.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 605 students (402 UG, 203 PG) from one of the tertiary hospitals (PG) and a medical colleges (UG) in Gujarat. A structured questionnaire assessed knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding mpox. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and independent t-tests.
resultsPG students demonstrated significantly higher knowledge scores than UG students (mean score 8.4 vs 6.5 out of 10, p<0.001). They showed greater awareness of mpox (187/203, 92.1% vs 314/402, 78.1%, p<0.001) and a better understanding of transmission routes, symptoms, and preventive measures. PG students also exhibited more positive attitudes, with a higher perception of mpox as a serious threat (152/203, 74.9% vs 241/402, 60.0%, p<0.001) and a greater willingness to get vaccinated (172/203, 84.7% vs 281/402, 69.9%, p<0.001). In terms of practices, PG students reported better adherence to preventive measures, including regular hand hygiene (127/203, 62.6% vs 201/402, 50.0% always practicing, p=0.002) and wearing face masks in crowded places (168/203, 82.8% vs 298/402, 74.1%, p=0.017).
conclusionSignificant differences in KAP regarding mpox exist between UG and PG students, with PG students consistently demonstrating higher levels of awareness, more positive attitudes, and better preventive practices. These findings highlight the need for targeted educational interventions to enhance mpox preparedness among university students, with particular attention to undergraduate populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.