ReviewCureus2024
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Trends and Impact of Neuromarketing Research: Peering Into the Consumer Brain.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromarketing is the application of neuroscience and cognitive science to understand and influence consumer behavior and the different underlying decision-making processes. This neuromarketing bibliometric study uses Scopus for bibliographic data and Biblioshiny and Citespace for the overall analysis. Annual scientific production is considered to outline some general lines of critical trends in volume over time. It provides an overview of the most relevant authors and their contributions and creates co-citation networks with the cited authors to identify influential researchers and collaborative networks. Sources that are most relevant to the discussion, together with co-citation patterns, show important articles and journals. Mapping countries' scientific production and collaboration show the manifold contributions of single countries to global research and how some topics can be created out of cooperation. Trend topics were analyzed to detect emerging research themes; factorial analysis helped in the actual clustering of the research topics. It identifies keywords with the most robust citation bursts, meaning times of the most concentrated research activity and emerging areas of interest. The research identifies gaps and produces some practical implications, putting forward a roadmap for future research directions and the necessity of advanced computational techniques in neuromarketing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.