Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398829›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Give It to Me Straight Doc: A Medical Student Perspective on Effective Goal-Oriented Clinical Education.

Adam S Mangold, Jacob P Barr, John McGeehan

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam S MangoldDepartment of Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
Jacob P BarrDepartment of Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.
John McGeehanDepartment of Medicine, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical years of medical school are a time when students navigate a new learning environment. Due to inexperience, discordance may exist between veteran attendings and students who do not have their bearings in this new setting. We propose a solution to strengthen the clinician-student relationship by promoting a culture of goal-oriented clinical education via a two-pronged approach. First, standardized learning objectives should be established for each clinical rotation. Second, and arguably more importantly, students should create individualized goals to complement these objectives and further their personal educational interests. Once a culture of goal-oriented clinical education is implemented, we believe students will navigate their clinical years with increased confidence and competence. In this piece, we discuss our personal attitudes toward why clinicians and students should set goals, how they can set them, and what these goals should include. Once goals are established, feedback must be provided to students to continue the learning process. This comes in the form of comments from supervising preceptors who focus on areas of interest identified by the student, as well as from the results of standardized assessments. We passionately believe that together, the synergism of goal setting, feedback, and assessment creates a perfect mixture conducive to the formation of a positive learning environment.

Indexed as

assessmentclinical learning environmentclinical medical educationfeedbackgoal setting

Identifiers

PMID39398829
PMCPMC11471271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.