ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Accuracy of Chest CT in Detecting COVID-19 Through Tracheobronchial Wall Thickness: Insights From Emergency Department Patients in Mid-2023.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The post-pandemic phase of the coronavirus infectious disease that emerged in 2019 (COVID-19) has necessitated updates in radiology, with emerging evidence suggesting tracheobronchial wall thickness as a potential new diagnostic marker. Purpose To evaluate the accuracy of chest computed tomography (CT) scans in identifying COVID-19 by assessing tracheobronchial wall thickness in mid-2023. Material and methods A retrospective review was conducted on 60 patients who underwent thoracoabdominal CT and the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) antigen tests during emergency visits between June and August 2023. Tracheobronchial wall thickness was measured using a 4-point scale (1=no thickening, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=significant). Lung assessment employed the COVID-19 Reporting and Data System (CO-RADS). Patients were classified based on antigen test results. The Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test compared characteristics and CT findings. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). Results The SARS-CoV-2-positive group showed significantly thicker tracheobronchial walls (median 1.5 mm vs. 1.2 mm, P < 0.001), especially in the trachea's membranous wall (median 1.2 mm vs. 0.9 mm, P < 0.001) and higher scores (median 3 vs. 2, P < 0.001). CO-RADS scores showed no significant difference. Quantitative and qualitative wall thickness assessments demonstrated high diagnostic value, with AUCs of 0.90 and 0.94, and accuracies of 85% and 87%, respectively. Conclusion Tracheobronchial wall thickness on chest CT exhibited high diagnostic accuracy, establishing it as a reliable marker for COVID-19 detection in mid-2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.