ArticleCureus2024
Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognostic Marker of Functional Outcome in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage (ICH) and Its Comparison With ICH Score: A Hospital-Based Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of inflammatory burden index with prognosis as well as stroke-associated pneumonia in non-surgical patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Predictive value and correlation analysis of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio for early prognosis in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage undergoing surgical treatment.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) signifies systemic inflammation, which may correlate with worse outcomes in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients. This study explored NLR as a prognostic marker of functional outcomes in ICH and compared it with the ICH score.
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted at a tertiary-care hospital in India. Blood was collected from patients with ICH to calculate NLR. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 90 days follow-up.
resultsThe area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for NLR predicting poor mRS scores (3-6) at discharge was 0.695 (p = 0.109), and at follow-up, it was 0.729 (p < 0.001) with a cut-off of ≥7.2, sensitivity 68%, and specificity 72%. The AUROC for ICH score was 0.846 (p = 0.003) at discharge and 0.845 (p < 0.001) at follow-up. DeLong's test indicated the ICH score had significantly better predictive performance than NLR at follow-up (p = 0.018).
conclusionsNLR is a potential prognostic marker for ICH outcomes, showing significant predictive value at 90 days follow-up. However, the ICH score remains a more reliable predictor. Integrating NLR into the ICH score may enhance its prognostic accuracy, but further validation in multicentric studies is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.