Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398761›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Conservative Approach for the Management of Odontogenic Keratocyst: Our Experience.

Rakshak Anand, Yajas Kumar, Nitin Bhagat

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rakshak AnandDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, IND.
Yajas KumarDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, IND.
Nitin BhagatDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Manav Rachna Dental College, Faridabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odontogenic keratocyst (OKC) is defined as an intraosseous lesion of odontogenic origin, which can be unicystic or polycystic. The selection of a treatment strategy is complex, and several conservative and surgical approaches with varying rates of recurrence have been covered in the literature. To prevent further damage in these individuals, patients should have the proper diagnostic and treatment plan taken into consideration. For proliferative and osteolytic lesions in gnathic bones, OKC should be ruled out as a differential diagnosis. In this article, we present three cases who had OKC diagnoses and underwent enucleation; so far, there has been no recurrence.

Indexed as

conservative managementenucleationmarsupializationodontogenic keratocystrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39398761
PMCPMC11470984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.