ReviewCureus2024
Effectiveness of Platelet Rich Fibrin in Accelerating Canine Distal Movement: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review aimed at a systematic evaluation of the available literature on the effect of platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) in accelerating canine distal movement (CD). An elaborate search of the available literature on the effect of PRF on the acceleration of canine distal movement was conducted using appropriate search terms in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Central, and Google Scholar until April 2024. The risk of bias within the studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB)-2 tool. Publication bias was assessed with a funnel plot, and a random effects model was used for quantitative synthesis. The certainty of the available evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Following the systematic search, a total of 11 studies were included for the qualitative analysis, and three studies were included for quantitative synthesis. Most of the studies reported an increased rate of canine distal movement following administration of PRF. The overall pooled CD at one, two, three, four, and five months showed a significantly increased mean CD in i-PRF (p<0.00001; MD = 0.23; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.32), and a significantly increased rate of CD was noted during the first and second months. The available studies had a moderate to low risk of bias and a moderate certainty of evidence. Hence, with a moderate certainty of evidence and a risk of bias, it can be concluded that PRF accelerates orthodontic tooth movement during the first two months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.