Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398749›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Factors Influencing Timely Follow-up After Inconclusive Screening Mammograms at a 3D Mobile Mammography Center.

Aditi Desai, Pura Rodriguez de la Vega, Grettel Castro, Prasad Bhoite, Julia Bisschops, Marcia Varella

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aditi DesaiDepartment of Medical Education, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Pura Rodriguez de la VegaDepartment of Medical Education, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Grettel CastroDepartment of Medical Education, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Prasad BhoiteDepartment of Humanities, Health, and Society, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Julia BisschopsDepartment of Medical Education, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.
Marcia VarellaDepartment of Medical Education, Florida International University, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background  The Linda Fenner 3D Mobile Mammography Center (LFMMC) was created to reduce disparities in screening for breast cancer and improve survival for women with limited access to such screening. However, for screened patients requiring follow-up testing, research has shown a wide variation of time taken to access diagnostic imaging, especially among uninsured women. Aim To explore factors associated with longer (>30 days) time intervals to complete diagnostic imaging after screening.  Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using data from the LFMMC from 2014 to 2022. Women living in Miami-Dade County (MDC), over the age of 40, uninsured, and requiring follow-up diagnostic imaging after breast cancer screening were included. Factors assessed included women's age, area of residency, race, primary language spoken, marital status, body mass index (BMI), history of hormone use, previous mammogram, breast implants, breast cancer in immediate family, past breast surgery, and menopause status. The interval of time taken between receiving a screening mammogram result and completing further diagnostic imaging was the outcome, dichotomized into greater than 30 days (longer follow-up time) or up to 30 days. Multivariable binary logistic regression models were used to estimate independent associations (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of selected factors and longer time intervals to complete diagnostic imaging follow-up.  Results We analyzed data from 926 eligible patients. The mean age was 50.1 years (SD = 8.81). A majority were white (n = 643; 69%), Hispanic (n = 698; 72%), had a history of previous mammograms (n = 589; 64%), and had no family history of breast cancer (n = 757; 82%). About 50% had a diagnostic follow-up exam performed after 30 days (median time to follow-up was 32, interquartile range 23-46 days). Single women had 30% lower odds of longer follow-up than married women (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93). Residents of Homestead (a city within Miami-Dade County) had 2.5 higher odds of having a longer time to follow-up, compared to non-Homestead residents (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.60-3.90). Conclusions Being single was associated with a shorter time to follow up with diagnostic imaging while residing in Homestead was associated with a longer time to follow-up. Further research with a larger sample and further details on patient characteristics are warranted to better identify targets for interventions aimed at optimizing continuity of care and detecting breast cancer at earlier stages.

Indexed as

breast cancerfollow-up delaysinconclusive screening mammogramsmobile mammographypublic health

Identifiers

PMID39398749
PMCPMC11469793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.