Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398734›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Coccygeal Nerve Blockade vs. Impar Ganglion Blockade in Coccydynia: A Randomised Clinical Trial.

Gevher Rabia Genc Perdecioglu, Gokhan Yildiz

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07060313 phase3completednot on this map

Targeting dual pathways in refractory coccydynia: a comparative study of ganglion impar block alone versus combined with pericoccygeal injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul UniversityRan2022 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsCoccydyniaArmsGanglion Impar Block, Ganglion Impar Block and Pericoccygeal Injection
NCT07427212 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Fluoroscopy-Guided Ganglion Impar and Ultrasound-Guided Coccygeal Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Chronic Coccydynia: A Prospective Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaglik Bilimleri UniversitesiRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsChronic CoccydyniaArmsGanglion impar radiofrequency ablation, Coccygeal nerve radiofrequency ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Return to cycling protocol after chronic coccydynia: a case report.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gevher Rabia Genc PerdeciogluDepartment of Algology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, TUR.
Gokhan YildizDepartment of Algology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and objective Coccydynia is a condition that causes pain around the coccyx, severely limiting functionality. Interventional treatment options are available for cases that do not respond to conservative treatment. Coccygeal nerve block (CnB) is a novel method for treating coccydynia. This study compared the efficacy of CnB and ganglion impar block (GiB) and aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CnB in treating coccydynia. Methods  The 12-week results of 56 patients were analysed. One group underwent ultrasound (US)-guided CnB, while the other group underwent fluoroscopy (FL)-guided GiB. Pain intensity was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS), and functionality was assessed using the PARIS Coccydynia Functionality Questionnaire. Evaluations were conducted before treatment, as well as four and 12 weeks after treatment. Results The baseline median NRS score was eight in both groups, while at week 12, it was three in the CnB group and 2.5 in the GiB group. The median PARIS score at baseline was seven in the CnB group and 6.5 in the GiB group, while at week 12, it was four and three, respectively. At week 12, compared to baseline, both the CNB and GiB groups showed statistically significant improvements in NRS and PARIS scores (p<0.001). When comparing the two groups, no significant difference was observed in the NRS and PARIS scores before and four and 12 weeks after treatment. No serious adverse events were observed in any patient. Conclusions  Coccydynia is sometimes refractory to treatment. In our study, we found that CnB, a method recently used in the treatment of coccydynia, was as effective as GiB, which has been used for a long time, and we found no evidence of superiority. The lack of radiation exposure due to its US-guided application, the superficial course of the coccygeal nerves and the low depth of needle penetration make it easier to perform. These advantages suggest that it will be a preferable method in the treatment of coccydynia.

Indexed as

coccydynia treatmentcoccyx painfluoroscopy interventionnerve blockperipheral nerve ultrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39398734
PMCPMC11466681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.