ReviewCureus2024
Prevention and Management of Infectious Complications in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive procedure increasingly used to treat renal stones and other intrarenal pathologies due to its reduced risk of complications, shorter recovery time, and lower postoperative pain compared to more invasive surgical techniques. However, despite its advantages, RIRS is associated with a significant risk of infectious complications, ranging from simple urinary tract infections (UTIs) to severe systemic infections such as urosepsis, which can lead to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and, in severe cases, mortality. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge on preventing and managing infectious complications associated with RIRS. By exploring the pathophysiology of these infections, identifying patient and procedural risk factors, and evaluating evidence-based strategies for prevention and management, this review provides comprehensive insights into minimizing infection risks in RIRS. A thorough literature review was conducted, examining studies and clinical trials that address the incidence, risk factors, prevention strategies, and management protocols for infections in RIRS. This review also assesses current guidelines from professional organizations and recent infection control technologies and practices advancements. The review identifies multiple risk factors contributing to infections in RIRS, including patient-specific factors such as comorbidities and procedural factors like the duration of surgery and use of instrumentation. Effective prevention strategies include preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, stringent aseptic techniques during surgery, and careful postoperative monitoring. The review also highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach involving urologists, infectious disease specialists, and microbiologists in managing complex cases of infection. Infectious complications remain a significant concern in RIRS, necessitating a comprehensive approach to prevention and management. By adhering to evidence-based guidelines and utilizing a multidisciplinary strategy, healthcare professionals can significantly reduce the incidence of infections, thereby improving patient outcomes and the overall safety of RIRS. Future research should focus on advancing infection control technologies and developing novel prophylactic and therapeutic approaches to further enhance the safety and effectiveness of RIRS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.