ArticleCureus2024
Comparison Between Conventional and Variable-Angle Locking Compression Plates in Complex Proximal Tibia Fractures.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The design process for orthopaedic implants : an introduction.Bone & joint research · 2026Article
- Mechanical Performance of Monoaxial Versus Polyaxial Locked Plates for Bone Fracture Repair: A Review.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProximal tibial fractures, particularly those involving the tibial plateau, are complex injuries that require careful management to restore knee function and prevent long-term disability. Recent advancements have introduced variable-angle locking compression plates (VALCP) as a potential alternative to the widely used fixed-angle locking plating techniques. These plates allow for more precise screw placement, potentially improving fixation and clinical outcomes. The goal of this study was to find out how well conventional locking plates and VALCP treat Schatzker's type I, II, and III tibial plateau fractures in terms of clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes using the Rasmussen functional and radiological grading systems, as well as the Oxford Knee Score (OKS).
methodsThis prospective study was undertaken by a tertiary care medical institute from January 2020 to August 2021. The study included a total of 60 patients with Schatzker's type I, II, and III tibial plateau fractures. These patients were randomly assigned to two groups, with each group consisting of 30 patients. Conventional locking compression plates (CLCP) treated one group, while VALCP treated the other. Clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes of patients were evaluated using the OKS, Rasmussen's functional grading system, and Rasmussen's radiological grading system. Additionally, the study documented and examined the duration of the surgical procedure, the stability of the fixation, and any complications that occurred in the postoperative phase over a span of six months.
resultsThe study included 52 males and eight females, aged 19 to 65 years. The mean age was 42.66 years for the conventional LCP group and 35.6 years for the VALCP group. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause of injury, with 86.67% in the VALCP group and 70% in the conventional group. In both groups, the majority of fractures were Schatzker type II. At the six-month follow-up, 60% of VALCP patients had excellent functional outcomes compared to 50% in the conventional group. Radiologically, 80% of VALCP patients had excellent results versus 73.33% in the conventional group. The OKS showed that 86.67% of VALCP patients had excellent results, compared to 73.33% in the conventional group. While VALCP showed slightly better outcomes, the differences were not statistically significant. Complications were minimal, with 90% of VALCP and 86.67% of conventional LCP patients experiencing no complications.
conclusionThe small number of patients, short-term study, and heterogeneity of fractures constitute a limitation of this study. VALCP plating in tibial plateau fractures is a good treatment modality because it seems to improve fixation, provides early mobilization, and has excellent to good functional and radiological outcomes. However, no significant difference in functional and radiological outcomes was found between the conventional and VALCP groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.