ArticleCureus2024
Clinical Profile of Leg Symptoms and Reflux in the Legs From Varicose Veins Disease Reported at a Tertiary Healthcare Institute in Jharkhand, India.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Varicose veins, affecting 8-10% of the population, are categorized as primary or secondary, depending on the etiology. The aim of the study is to assess the clinical profile of leg symptoms and reflux in the legs of varicose veins disease among patients reported in a tertiary hospital. Patients and methods An institution-based cross-sectional exploratory study comprising 56 patients with reflux in legs of varicose veins disease selected through purposive sampling, conducted in the OPD (outpatient department), general surgery, AIIMS (All India Institute of Medical Sciences) Deoghar. The standardized study instrument includes the Aberdeen varicose veins questionnaire, and patients' symptoms and concerns questionnaire, followed by a brief clinical examination based on CEAP (clinical, etiological, anatomical, and pathophysiological) classification and VCSS (venous clinical severity score) for C5/6 and color-flow duplex imaging of both lower limbs. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for data analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Results Bilateral presentation of the disease had been seen in 57.1% (n=32) participants, and the common history of present illness reported by participants included swelling along the veins (n=55, 98.2%), pain (n=51, 91.1%), and discoloration (n=33, 58.9%). The clinical grading revealed that most participants, i.e., 87.5% (n=49) had C2 and 75% (n=42) had C3 disease. The majority of participants 96.4% (n=54) suffered from primary varicose veins. Furthermore, all subjects exhibited superficial vein involvement, along with one individual having deep vein involvement and a few participants (n=35, 62.5%) having perforators. With this, the majority of participants (n=55, 98.2%) showed reflux pathology. Conclusion Varicose veins typically afflict men in their 40s and 50s who work in positions of extended standing. Limited awareness in the Santhal Pargana division, Jharkhand state, India may result in poor healthcare outcomes. Improving public awareness may help lessen disease-related consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.