ArticleCureus2024
Functional Outcomes of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study Using the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-16 Questionnaire.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic rhinosinusitis affects a large portion of the adult population, and its symptoms can be burdensome to patients' quality of life. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is usually required after medical therapies fail.
objectiveTo analyze the outcomes of FESS in a tertiary hospital using the modified Arabic Sinonasal Outcome Test.
methodsThis prospective cohort study involved administering an electronic questionnaire, the modified Arabic Sinonasal Outcome Test-16, pre-operatively to patients diagnosed with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent FESS. This test was subsequently resent six weeks post-operatively. Scores were calculated by adding the total score of the 16 questions. The lowest possible score was 0, and the highest score was 48. Pre- and post-operative scores were compared.
resultsTwenty-eight patients were included, with a mean age of 37.3±14.6. Our findings showed that FESS significantly improved all symptoms except cough and exophthalmos (p < 0.001). Nose congestion had the highest improvement score, with 78.6% of patients experiencing better symptoms. Lack of good night sleep was the second most ameliorated symptom, with 75% of patients showing improvement.
conclusionModified Arabic Sinonasal Outcome Test scores were significantly improved after FESS. Therefore, primary treatment with FESS should be considered for patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis. However, further studies are recommended to investigate the long-term benefits of FESS and the impact of comorbidities, such as asthma and allergic rhinitis, on outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.