Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398689›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Evaluating Medical and Surgical Treatments for Ectopic Pregnancy at a Tertiary Hospital in Dubai.

Elham A Akbari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elham A AkbariObstetrics and Gynecology, Latifa Hospital, Dubai, ARE.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe current data about ectopic pregnancy in the UAE is limited, including the incidence, method of management, and its effectiveness. This study aimed to determine the frequency of medical and surgical management in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy and the efficacy of each modality used.

methodTwo hundred and nine patients were diagnosed with ectopic pregnancies in the years 2018 and 2019 in Latifa Hospital and were included in this study. The patients were treated with either intramuscular injection of methotrexate (single or two doses) or surgical management.

resultsMethotrexate was administered to 101 patients (48%). In 77 patients (76%), a single dose of methotrexate was administered, and in 24 patients (24%), two doses of methotrexate were administered. In the single-dose group, 75.3% (58 out of 77 patients) were successfully treated and completely recovered. While in the two-dose group, the success rate was 58.3% (14 out of 24 patients). On the other hand, among patients who underwent surgical management, the success rate was 97.2% (105 out of 108 patients). The difference in the success rates was statistically significant.

conclusionThe results of the study showed that medical and surgical management were used almost equally in managing patients with ectopic pregnancy (48% vs. 52%, respectively). Furthermore, it was shown that single-dose methotrexate treatment was more successful than two doses. However, surgical management had the highest success rate among the three modalities.

Indexed as

laparoscopic surgeriesmethotrexate ectopicmultiple-dose methotrexate protocolruptured ectopic pregnancysingle-dose methotrexate protocolunruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39398689
PMCPMC11469796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.