ArticleCureus2024
Implementing the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) Tool for Training Medical Faculty.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Despite simulation being widely recognized as an essential component of medical education, there remains a dearth of literature on its implementation and effectiveness in pre-clerkship medical education. In order to effectively encompass healthcare simulations within medical instruction, it is imperative to first address the often neglected gap in faculty development and training. With this in mind, we aim to present our experience in implementing the Debriefing Assessment for Simulation in Healthcare (DASH) tool in training faculty at Nova Southeastern University Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, USA. Methods Twenty participating faculty practiced instructing a simulation session and completed the DASH tool. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used to report the findings. Results The Survey Rater and Student DASH version results were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test to see if there was a difference between the two groups for each question. Conclusions All faculty participating in healthcare simulations should be trained in order to deliver a structured debriefing experience. In healthcare medical simulation, the identification of faculty training is imperative to address many of the challenges of healthcare today, including patient safety issues and limitations of medical training in hospital settings. Implications The study aims to serve as a template that researchers can use in identifying potential faculty training development, as the benefits of having faculty trained in simulation methodology are successful in higher educational settings. Further studies in simulation-based education faculty training are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.