ArticlePalliative medicine reports2024
Time to Develop Guidelines for Spiritual Care in Serious Illness.
Article in Palliative medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a Standardised Screening on the Assessment and Addressing of Spiritual Needs in Inpatient Palliative Care in Germany: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of religion and health · 2026Article
- Development and validation of the questionnaire "Spiritual Needs in Palliative Care" in Finnish.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Article
- Interventions to support spirituality among adults with cancer: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Utilization and perceptions of chaplaincy among hospitalized adults of Dharmic religions with cancer.Cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2022, a JAMA systematic review of 342 high quality studies called for spiritual care to be a routine part of care for patients with serious illness. The review's multidisciplinary panel made several recommendations for addressing patients' and families' spiritual concerns. Despite these evidence-based recommendations, there are no clinical guidelines that inform when and how such spiritual care should be provided. We propose convening a multi-disciplinary workgroup to generate specific and actionable guidelines for incorporating spiritual care in serious illness care. We suggest three workgroup priorities: (1) determining best approaches to identifying patient and family members' spiritual care needs; (2) developing ways to integrate chaplains into routine clinical care; and (3) determining best approaches to communicate availability of spiritual care. Developing these guidelines is an imperative next step to deliver high quality, person and family-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.