Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398644›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024

Numerical modeling of the abdominal wall biomechanics and experimental analysis for model validation.

Silvia Spadoni, Silvia Todros, Piero G Pavan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Silvia SpadoniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Silvia TodrosDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Piero G PavanDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation of the biomechanics of the abdominal wall is particularly important to understand the onset of pathological conditions related to weakening and injury of the abdominal muscles. A better understanding of the biomechanics of the abdominal wall could be a breakthrough in the development of new therapeutic approaches. For this purpose, several studies in the literature propose finite element models of the human abdomen, based on the geometry of the abdominal wall from medical images and on constitutive formulations describing the mechanical behavior of fascial and muscular tissues. The biomechanics of the abdominal wall depends on the passive mechanical properties of fascial and muscle tissue, on the activation of abdominal muscles, and on the variable intra-abdominal pressure. To assess the quantitative contribution of these features to the development and validation of reliable numerical models, experimental data are fundamental. This work presents a review of the state of the art of numerical models developed to investigate abdominal wall biomechanics. Different experimental techniques, which can provide data for model validation, are also presented. These include electromyography, ultrasound imaging, intraabdominal pressure measurements, abdominal surface deformation, and stiffness/compliance measurements.

Indexed as

abdominal wallintra-abdominal pressurein vivo experimentsmuscle contractionnumerical modeling

Identifiers

PMID39398644
PMCPMC11466767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.