Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398454›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2024

Reflections from Chinese and Japanese Physicians on Medical Disputes.

Hua Xu, Yining Ruan, Taketoshi Okita, Masao Tabata, Yasuhiro Kadooka, Atsushi Asai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hua XuDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryocho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture 980-8575 Japan.
Yining RuanDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryocho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture 980-8575 Japan.
Taketoshi OkitaDivision of Philosophy and Ethics, Department of Culture and Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Masao TabataPatient Safety Management Office, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Yasuhiro KadookaDepartment of Bioethics, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kumamoto, Japan.
Atsushi AsaiDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1, Seiryocho, Aoba-Ku, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture 980-8575 Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6698-1452

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician-patient disputes are a major problem in healthcare. Physician-patient conflicts, workplace violence, and direct involvement in disputes have a significant negative impact on the well-being of physicians. China and Japan have similar cultures but differing healthcare systems. The present study aimed to examine and compare the experiences and perceptions of Chinese and Japanese physicians regarding medical disputes. Qualitative descriptive content analysis was performed for 18 cases from each country to assess the major issues involved in each case and their impact on the physicians. Common issues in medical disputes for both countries included monetary motives of patients and/or families, violence/threats from patients and/or families, the inability of patients and/or families to understand the risk of complications, and the uncertainties of medicine. The serious impact of medical disputes on the mental health and professionalism of physicians was also an issue shared by physicians of both countries. There were, however, differences in the magnitude and frequency of these issues between the two countries. Pre-existing distrust of physicians among patients and/or families was noted only by Chinese physicians, and insufficient information disclosure by physicians was noted only by Japanese physicians. In conclusion, there were similarities and differences between the two countries in the perceptions of physicians regarding medical disputes. Our analysis revealed differing healthcare situations due to cultural and institutional differences as well as universal problems intrinsic to medicine. Based on our results, we propose several key principles to improve the physician-patient relationship.

Indexed as

Case analysisChinaCross-cultural studyJapanMedical disputeProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID39398454
PMCPMC11464652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.