Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398424›Full record

ArticlePhenomics (Cham, Switzerland)2024

Kidney Function and Cardiovascular Disease: Evidence from Observational Studies and Mendelian Randomization Analyses.

Wenjun Yang, Xuemei Wu, Manying Zhao, Jianying Hu, Chenhao Lin, Zhendong Mei, Jing Chen, Xu-Jie Zhou, Sheng Nie, Jing Nie and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Wenjun Yang *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2381-7887
Xuemei Wu *Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9721-4819
Manying Zhao *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3129-5007
Jianying HuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1708-3530
Chenhao LinState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-801X
Zhendong MeiState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6235-8647
Jing ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200040 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7259-5280
Xu-Jie ZhouKey Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, 100034 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-707X
Sheng NieNational Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8267-7909
Jing NieNational Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1002-5562
Xiang GaoMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-6509
Yan ZhengState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID 0000-0003-1129-3147
Zhonghan SunState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Human Phenome Institute and School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, 2005 Songhu Road, Shanghai, 200433 China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4171-9794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Observational studies have identified that declined kidney function was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the causation of such associations requires further exploration. Here, we compared the observational associations of various kidney function measurements with CVD and its major subtypes and further assessed the potential causality using Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses with individual-level data of 306,246 participants from the UK Biobank and genome-wide association study summary-level data from FinnGen consortium, Coronary ARtery DIsease Genome wide Replication and Meta-analysis plus The Coronary Artery Disease Genetics (CARDIoGRAMplusC4D) consortium, and MEGASTROKE Consortium, respectively. Kidney function measurements included circulating levels of cystatin C and creatinine, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR), and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) from three chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration formulae (i.e., that using cystatin C, creatinine, and both). In the observational analyses, decreased kidney function measurements were associated with a higher risk of CVD in the UK Biobank study. For example, per one standard deviation decrease in baseline estimated glomerular filtration rates using both cystatin C and creatinine (eGFRcys + cre) was associated with 11% higher risk of CVD (hazard ratio = 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.90). In contrast, two-sample MR analyses did not suggest significant associations of any genetically instrumented kidney function measurement with the risk of CVD or its subtypes. Our findings suggested the inverse associations of kidney function measurements with CVD risk from observational studies were not supported by large MR analyses. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43657-023-00145-7.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseCausalityKidney functionMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID39398424
PMCPMC11467168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.