Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398395›Full record

ReviewVisceral medicine2024

The Clinical Spectrum of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Facts and Fictions.

Elisa Marabotto, Andrea Pasta, Francesco Calabrese, Mentore Ribolsi, Amir Mari, Vincenzo Savarino, Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Visceral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Elisa MarabottoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Andrea PastaGastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Francesco CalabreseGastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Mentore RibolsiUnit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University, Rome, Italy.
Amir MariIsrael Institute of Technology, Hadera, Israel and Nazareth Hospital EMMS, Nazareth, Israel.
Vincenzo SavarinoGastroenterology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Edoardo Vincenzo SavarinoDepartment of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This review addresses the intricate spectrum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), a condition affecting 10-30% of the Western population. GERD is characterized by the backflow of gastric contents into the esophagus, causing typical and atypical symptoms. Its pathophysiology involves various factors such as hiatal hernia, esophageal motor disorders, and dietary triggers. The review explores the complexities of GERD spectrum, including nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), reflux hypersensitivity (RH), and functional heartburn (FH). Summary: The diagnostic process for GERD, based on the Lyon Consensus 2.0 criteria, encompasses clinical evaluation, endoscopy, and functional tests, including pH-impedance and wireless-pH monitoring. NERD, a significant subset of GERD, is defined by reflux symptoms and abnormal reflux burden without mucosal damage. RH, classified under functional esophageal disorders by Rome IV criteria, presents with typical esophageal symptoms associated with reflux but lacks of structural, inflammatory, or motor causes. FH is identified by heartburn with normal endoscopy, reflux testing, and esophageal manometry results. The management of RH and FH, focusing on reducing esophageal hypersensitivity, varies from standard GERD treatments. Key Messages: The review emphasizes the necessity of personalized treatment strategies due to the complexity and overlap of GERD subtypes. It highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach, involving gastroenterologists, psychologists, and other specialists, to improve patient outcomes and quality of life. The article underscores that understanding the distinctions and overlaps among NERD, RH, and FH is crucial for effective management, and the need for innovative approaches in diagnosis and treatment to address the unique challenges of each subtype.

Indexed as

Functional heartburnNonerosive reflux diseaseReflux hypersensitivityRome criteria

Identifiers

PMID39398395
PMCPMC11466451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.