ReviewVisceral medicine2024
Fundoplication: Old Concept for Novel Challenges?
Review in Visceral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal Complaints After Fundoplication: Rapid Review and Evidence Mapping.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- A Historical and Scientific Review of Anti-Reflux Surgery: Evolution, Evidence, and Future Directions.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Nissen Fundoplication: 70 years of a simple and brilliant idea in the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
- Preoperative sarcopenia and its impact on postoperative complications in laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery: a clinical analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of crural reinforcement with bio-aHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025Article
- The Potential Role ofMicroorganisms · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the most common esophageal disorder worldwide, is a progressive condition that may lead to Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma. Upfront therapy with proton pump inhibitors is ineffective in up to 40% of patients. The scope of surgical therapy is to reconstruct the natural antireflux barrier provided by the diaphragmatic crura, the lower esophageal sphincter, and the gastroesophageal flap valve. Summary: For 70 years, the 360° Nissen fundoplication has dominated the surgical scenario and is still considered the gold-standard treatment. However, over the past two decades, the Toupet and Dor partial fundoplications have emerged as alternative options to decrease the incidence of dysphagia and gas-bloat syndrome. Randomized and observational clinical studies have shown that the outcomes of partial fundoplication compare favorably with those of the Nissen and can provide satisfactory quality of life minimizing the risk of side effects. However, reflux control and anatomical integrity of partial fundoplications may fade away over time. Further research and close scrutiny of new surgical procedures and technologies is in progress to improve clinical outcomes and provide a more personalized and durable antireflux therapy. Key Messages: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery is a safe and effective therapy for GERD. It should be performed in centers offering a comprehensive diagnostic pathway and a spectrum of techniques tailored to the individual GERD phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.