Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398380›Full record

ReviewChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2024

Topological Characterization of Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Perspective.

Lawson T Glasby, Joan L Cordiner, Jason C Cole, Peyman Z Moghadam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Altermagnetic Metal-Organic Frameworks.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A pcu topology metal-organic framework, Ni(1,4-bib)(inca)Journal of materials chemistry. A · 2025
    Article
  14. Functional flexible adsorbents and their potential utility.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lawson T GlasbyDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Joan L CordinerDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom.
Jason C ColeCambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0291-6317
Peyman Z MoghadamDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1592-0139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) began to emerge over two decades ago, resulting in the deposition of 120 000 MOF-like structures (and counting) into the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD). Topological analysis is a critical step toward understanding periodic MOF materials, offering insight into the design and synthesis of these crystals via the simplification of connectivity imposed on the complete chemical structure. While some of the most prevalent topologies, such as face-centered cubic (

Identifiers

PMID39398380
PMCPMC11467834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.