Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398346›Full record

ArticleIBRO neuroscience reports2024

Psychiatric disorders from EEG signals through deep learning models.

Zaeem Ahmed, Aamir Wali, Saman Shahid, Shahid Zikria, Jawad Rasheed, Tunc Asuroglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IBRO neuroscience reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zaeem AhmedDepartment of Data Sciences, National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
Aamir WaliDepartment of Data Sciences, National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
Saman ShahidDepartment of Sciences & Humanities, National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
Shahid ZikriaDepartment of Sciences & Humanities, National University of Computer & Emerging Sciences (NUCES), FAST Lahore Campus, Punjab, Pakistan.
Jawad RasheedDepartment of Computer Engineering, Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University, Istanbul 34303, Turkey.
Tunc AsurogluFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere 33720, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric disorders present diagnostic challenges due to individuals concealing their genuine emotions, and traditional methods relying on neurophysiological signals have limitations. Our study proposes an improved EEG-based diagnostic model employing Deep Learning (DL) techniques to address this. By experimenting with DL models on EEG data, we aimed to enhance psychiatric disorder diagnosis, offering promising implications for medical advancements. We utilized a dataset of 945 individuals, including 850 patients and 95 healthy subjects, focusing on six main and nine specific disorders. Quantitative EEG data were analyzed during resting states, featuring power spectral density (PSD) and functional connectivity (FC) across various frequency bands. Employing artificial neural networks (ANN), K nearest neighbors (KNN), Long short-term memory (LSTM), bidirectional Long short-term memory (Bi LSTM), and a hybrid CNN-LSTM model, we performed binary classification. Remarkably, all proposed models outperformed previous approaches, with the ANN achieving 96.83 % accuracy for obsessive-compulsive disorder using entire band features. CNN-LSTM attained the same accuracy for adjustment disorder, while KNN and LSTM achieved 98.94 % accuracy for acute stress disorder using specific feature sets. Notably, KNN and Bi-LSTM models reached 97.88 % accuracy for predicting obsessive-compulsive disorder. These findings underscore the potential of EEG as a cost-effective and accessible diagnostic tool for psychiatric disorders, complementing traditional methods like MRI. Our study's advanced DL models show promise in enhancing psychiatric disorder detection and monitoring, with significant implications for clinical application, inspiring hope for improved patient care and outcomes. The potential of EEG as a diagnostic tool for psychiatric disorders is substantial, as it can lead to improved patient care and outcomes in the field of psychiatry.

Indexed as

Biomarkers for Mental HealthCNN-LSTMEEG Signal ProcessingMental State ClassificationNeural Network in EEGPsychiatric Disorders Diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39398346
PMCPMC11466652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.