ArticleFoot & ankle orthopaedics2024
Surgical Treatment of Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy Augmented With Human Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Foot & ankle orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery After Surgery for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy With and Without Bioinductive Scaffold Augmentation: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Achilles Repair System (PARS) Repair With vs Without Bio-inductive Scaffold Augmentation for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Impact of Coverage with an Acellular Dermal Matrix and Suturing Versus Primary Closure on Tongue Pain and Oral Morbidity After Lingual Mucosa Harvesting for Urethroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study.European urology open science · 2026Article
- Treating insertional Achilles tendinitis with bio inductive collagen scaffold - Does it improve outcomes? A case series.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is often surgically treated with Achilles tendon partial or total detachment, debridement and repair of the Achilles tendon, excision of retrocalcaneal exostosis, and suture anchor reattachment. To date, there is no report that examines the use of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) augmentation in this procedure without the use of suture anchor reattachment. Methods: Thirty-two female and 10 male patients (mean age 52 years) with IAT underwent surgical treatment including partial detachment of the Achilles tendon, excision of the retrocalcaneal exostosis, debridement and repair of the Achilles tendon, and augmentation with human acellular dermal matrix allograft. Outcomes measured were the visual analog scale (VAS) score, time to weightbearing, major and minor complications. Results: Forty-two patients were followed for a mean of 20.8 months. The VAS score improved from a mean of 5.1 to 1.9 at final follow-up. The mean time to weightbearing was 4.4 weeks. Eleven patients (26.2%) experienced complications. One patient (2.4%) suffered a rupture of the Achilles in the early postoperative period. Three patients (7.1%) had delayed wound healing, with 1 (2.4%) requiring surgical debridement. Two (4.8%) experienced continued pain requiring further surgical treatment. Conclusion: This protocol for surgical treatment of IAT with the use of human ADM allograft augmentation resulted in improved VAS scores and was associated with a low risk of postoperative infection without a prolonged nonweightbearing period. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.