Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398257›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

Value of image enhancement of endoscopic ultrasound for diagnosis of gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions.

Hirofumi Yamazaki, Yasunobu Yamashita, Takaaki Tamura, Yuki Kawaji, Takashi Tamura, Masahiro Itonaga, Reiko Ashida, Toshio Shimokawa, Fumiyoshi Kojima, Keiji Hayata and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Hirofumi YamazakiSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Yasunobu YamashitaSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6725-5708
Takaaki TamuraSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Yuki KawajiSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Takashi TamuraSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Masahiro ItonagaSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Reiko AshidaSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Toshio ShimokawaClinical Study Support Center Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Fumiyoshi KojimaDepartment of Human Pathology Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Keiji HayataSecond Department of Surgery Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Takao MaekitaSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4160-7613
Mikitaka IguchiSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.
Masayuki KitanoSecond Department of Internal Medicine Wakayama Medical University Wakayama Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6885-9223

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Among subepithelial lesions (SELs), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) should be identified and surgically treated at an early stage. However, it is difficult to diagnose SELs smaller than 20 mm. In recent years, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography (EUS-EG) and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS) have been reported to be useful for the diagnosis of SELs, although the diagnostic accuracy of a combination of EUS techniques with image enhancement is unknown. Methods: Patients with SELs who underwent EUS-guided tissue acquisition, EUS shear-wave elastography (EUS-SWE), EUS strain elastography (EUS-SE), and CH-EUS from January 2019 to June 2023 were enrolled. To assess the diagnostic accuracy for differentiating GISTs from other SELs, shear-wave velocity on EUS-SWE, the strain ratio on EUS-SE, and vascularity on CH-EUS were determined and their diagnostic accuracies were compared. Results: Forty-three patients were enrolled. When the cut-off value was set at 3.27 m/s, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of shear-wave velocity were 28.6%, 86.2%, and 34.9%, respectively. When the cut-off value was set at 3.79, the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of the strain ratio were 93.1%, 64.3%, and 83.7%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CH-EUS were 79.3%, 92.3%, and 83.7%, respectively. When EUS-SE was combined with CH-EUS, the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy were the highest among binary combinations of image enhancement modalities. Conclusions: EUS-SE and CH-EUS are useful for differentiating GISTs from other SELs. Furthermore, the use of both modalities may further improve the identification of GISTs.

Indexed as

contrast‐enhanced harmonic EUSEUS shear‐wave elastographyEUS strain elastographyGISTsubepithelial lesions

Identifiers

PMID39398257
PMCPMC11470742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.