Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39398106›Full record

ArticlePalliative care and social practice2024

Developing and evaluating Compassionate Workplace Programs to promote health and wellbeing around serious illness, dying and loss in the workplace (EU-CoWork): a transdisciplinary, cross-national research project.

Steven Vanderstichelen, Deborah De Moortel, Karina Nielsen, Klaus Wegleitner, Malin Eneslätt, Tiziana Sardiello, Daniela Martos, Jennifer Webster, Irene Nikandrou, Ellen Delvaux and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Steven VanderstichelenEnd-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 103, Building K, Brussels 1090, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7214-704X
Deborah De MoortelCompassionate Communities Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Karina NielsenSheffield University Management School, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Klaus WegleitnerCenter for Interdisciplinary Research on Aging and Care, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Malin EneslättDepartment of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0050-4853
Tiziana SardielloDepartment of Social Sciences, Technology and Arts, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5625-1744
Daniela MartosSorgenetz - Association for the Promotion of Societal Care Culture. Life/Ageing/Dementia/Dying, Vienna, Austria.
Jennifer WebsterHealth and Safety Executive (HSE), Science Division, Buxton, UK.
Irene NikandrouDepartment of Marketing and Communication, Athens University of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece.
Ellen DelvauxIDEWE, External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3072-5972
Carol TishelmanEnd-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-0342
Joachim CohenCompassionate Communities Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Most employees will experience serious illness, caregiving, dying and loss (End-of-Life (EoL) experiences) at multiple points throughout their working lives. These experiences impact affected employees but also their colleagues in terms of health and wellbeing, and the workplace as a whole in terms of workplace safety, productivity and labour relations. The impact of EoL experiences on employees means that workplaces are called to play a more active role in providing support for EoL experiences. Aim: To describe how the EU-CoWork (2024-2028) project addresses its main aims to (1) create Compassionate Workplace cultures, practices and policies and improve health and wellbeing for employees dealing with EoL experiences in different national work contexts in Europe; (2) describe and evaluate the process of co-creation and implementation of Compassionate Workplace Programs (CWPs) and how these influence the programs' outcomes. Design: EU-CoWork employs a facilitated and co-creative Developmental Evaluation approach to the development of 12 tailored CWPs across four European countries (Belgium, Austria, Sweden and Greece). Methods: To evaluate the outcomes and processes leading to these outcomes, a mixed-methods Realist Evaluation methodology is applied, formulating and testing Context-Mechanism-Outcomes configurations and combining longitudinal quantitative and qualitative data collections. Results: EU-CoWork will generate evidence to support an expanded model of occupational health and safety risk factors sensitive to the specific challenges related to employees' EoL experiences. In doing so, several challenges will have to be navigated: involving employees with EoL experiences while avoiding overburdening them, avoiding tokenistic engagement, managing power differentials, balancing the need for scientific rigour with the flexibility required in co-creation, reconciling different epistemologies and disciplinary traditions and organisational resistance to change. Conclusion: There are potential long-lasting broader societal impacts through the stimulation of open discourse on EoL topics, the reconciliation of work and care, and changes in gendered work and care patterns.

Indexed as

Compassionate WorkplacesEnd-of-Lifeoccupational healthpublic healthrealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID39398106
PMCPMC11468009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.